|
|
March 19, 2008
CBCA 945-TRAV
In the Matter of KEN S. STONER
Ken
M. Stoner, Stafford, VA, Claimant.
Rodney
W. Wood, Director, Financial Services Center, Department of Veterans Affairs,
Austin, TX, appearing for Department of Veterans Affairs.
McCANN, Board Judge.
Ken
M. Stoner is employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. In April 2007, Mr. Stoner traveled on
business from Washington, D.C., to Elberton, Georgia, and stayed there for two
nights. On the third night he stayed in
Athens, Georgia. Elberton is
approximately 105 miles from Atlanta, Georgia; and Athens is approximately 73
miles from Atlanta. Mr. Stoner=s orders indicated that he would be staying in Atlanta
despite his assignments in the other cities.
Mr. Stoner was reimbursed for his trip based upon the temporary duty
(TDY) per diem rates applicable to Atlanta.
The
Department of Veterans Affairs randomly selected Mr. Stoner=s travel voucher for review and noticed the
discrepancy between the travel destination shown on the orders and the actual
locations where Mr. Stoner stayed. Since
the per diem for Atlanta exceeds the per diem for both Elberton and Athens, the
Department determined that Mr. Stoner had been overpaid $91.42.
Mr.
Stoner contends that he should not be required to pay back the $91.42 because
he was required to follow procedures that he advised against. He also contends that the travel regulations
are being selectively enforced against him.
Finally, he contends that the regulations permit or allow the agency to
pay the claimed per diem rate.
41 CFR 301‑11.300(d), -11.302 (2006).
It
is indeed unfortunate that Mr. Stoner was provided with incorrect orders and
given incorrect advice. However, bad
advice provided by agency employees cannot modify provisions in the travel
regulations that determine the amount of Mr. Stoner=s entitlement where no independent authority for such reimbursement
exists.
Joel Williams, GSBCA 16437-RELO, 04-2 BCA & 32,769; Masood Badizadegan, GSBCA 14393-RELO, 98‑2 BCA & 29,789. The Federal
Travel Regulation provides that per diem reimbursement rates will be determined
by the TDY location. 41 CFR
301-11.7. Accordingly, the rates used
for this TDY should have been those rates applicable to Elberton and Athens
instead of that for Atlanta.
The
regulations cited by Mr. Stoner, 41 CFR
301-11.300(d), -11.302, as authorizing
the agency to approve his actual expenses, do not apply. These regulations authorize the agency to use
its discretion in appropriate circumstances to approve actual expenses. The agency has not chosen to exercise that
discretion under the circumstances of this case. Also, Mr. Stoner=s contention that the travel regulations are being
selectively enforced against him has no merit.
Mr. Stoner must return the $91.42 overpayment to the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
______________________________
R.
ANTHONY McCANN
Board
Judge